The Nephilim, Fallen Angels and the Last Days Part 2

4 Comments:

• 1 At 10:22 pm Oct/20/09 Brian James Alexande said...

  Overall, you did a fine job, Brother Goodman, on your presentation of this difficult topic! To this day, many of the faith still believe in the "Corruption of the godly Line of Seth" interpretation: for Genesis Chapter Six. However, there is one point I would disagree with you on. You stated God's Ex-Angels possessed the bodies of men to bring this type of coitus about. The text, though, does not mention possession in Genesis Chapter Six. Even with some kind of genetic manipulation on their part, the human genome simply doesn't have the capacity to account for the enormous size and strength the Nephilim had. Futhermore, it says in Genesis that Noah was perfect in his generation. The Hebrew for perfect implies not being genetically mared by the demonic activities, in these regards, that took place in the antediluvian world. Genetic engineering couldn't suffice for Noah not being genetically corrupted. Rather, it was the Ex-Angels themselves who did the intercourse directly! Many people say: "But they wouldn't be able to do this!" Really! Paul mentioned women should wear coverings for their hair; to keep from accidentially sexually arousing demons! Now if coitus is impossible for them to do, then how could one account for this passage? Bill Schnoebelen recounted an incident, which occurred, where this very thing happened to a woman at a church group. She was being sexually molested from an unseen invisible force. When they placed a covering for her hair, it stopped. The demon didn't possess her husband, though, to do it with her. Now I'm not saying that every woman in church should start wearing baseball hats to keep something like this from developing. Undoubtedly, the demons, in this circumstance, were putting God to the test to see if he has any arbitrary words in his scriptures---which he doesn't! Some food for thought, since Genesis Chapter Six still poses many "bones of contention" amongst interpreters. Thank you for your programs. I've learned much from them, and they truly are a blessing. Kept up the good work for Christ's kingdom!

• 2 At 3:15 am Nov/17/09 Norman Lavigne said...

  The Nephlim in Genesis 6:1-4; the sons of the true God Yah-Vah El'Shad-dai who took the daughters of Men created a different DNA than the DNA of Adam And Eve. The DNA of Adam and Eve were the Royal blood of the Creator of man and woman. The Nephelim and the daughters of men was a different DNA called the Royal "Blue" blood. This Royal Blue blood was on Noak Ark through Noah's Son Ham and his generation: See: 1Chronthians 1:8. Nimrod was the beginning of these Royal Blue Blood who later were called the seven heads of the wild beast. See Revelation 12:3, 7-9: Revelation 17:10.

  I have written a book called 666 "Biblical" Truth and if you want more information I would gladly send you a copy. I do not sell my books, they are free for the asking. Check my web site: http://www.benyahvahbooks.com Yours truly: NormanLavigne

• 3 At 11:33 am Dec/07/09 Charles said...

  That was a wonderful movie full of insight, knowledge and truth thank GOD for using you, He will open many eyes with you.

• 4 At 6:43 am Feb/11/10 Brandon said...

  Thanks for the interesting discussion.

  I am confused about your argument that God wouldn't allow someone to come back from the dead based on Deuteronomy 18:10. Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead, so it would seem that even though God may find the practice detestable when attempted by humans, he has no problem doing it himself. Possibly what God detests about people practicing necromancy is that they not only lack the capability to do it but are also attempting to act far outside their authority.

  I understand that you are attempting to only use the bible as authority, however, as you know, the book of Enoch gets more in depth on this subject. And it is part of the Ethiopian bible. It adds a lot of background on this subject.

  I am not convinced that the nephilim were men. I thin the support is week for your argument that the Watchers impregnated these women by possessing human men. Without proving this single point, the rest of your argument fails because if off spring is produced by the mating of an angel and human, the offspring has to carry angel DNA. Different species can mate in nature and produce offspring, such as mules (horse mating with a donkey) and ligers (lions mating with tigers). If you believe a literal interpretation, Mary bore God's son. So human women appear to be able to mate with spiritual and flesh beings.

  The text seems pretty simple. Sons of God (Angels) had children with the Daughters of Man (Humans).

  You have to add a whole lot more in there to get what you are arguing: Sons of God possessed human men, these possessed men had children with women, and the Angels manipulated the DNA of those children to make them giants.